Product photo shoots are expensive, especially for fashion retail, where trends and seasonality bring new styles at least 2x every year, sometimes every few weeks! Further complicating this is the evolving landscape of brands wanting to show a wide variety of models that mirrors their customers’ tastes: size differentiations, body archetypes, etc. It’s untenable to try and shoot the same pair of jeans on 16-20 different models. Can computers solve this problem? Yes.
Through our research, Iterate has found and given recommendations of two different photo automation, or virtual try-on, leaders in curation. These are Flixstock and Vue.ai. We’ve looked at hundreds of different curators to find the best for our customers, and of all the places we’ve looked, these are the best.
Flixstock boasts a 9% increase in CVR, a 10% reduced Go-To-Market time, a 6.5% reduction in online returns, and a 25% reduced cost per image. These may just look like numbers, but these increases and reductions can mean everything to your company. In addition, they have managed to help companies get an overall increased operational efficiency, taking 2 days instead of 2 weeks. This difference would mean the world to any company.
Vue.ai also has a lot to offer, with numbers revealing 75% photoshoot costs saved, 5x faster than traditional photoshoots, a 40% increase in engagement rate, and a 1.5x lift in conversion rate. More numbers, yes, but think about how these would apply to a business. Saving costs and increasing efficiency is everything, and with Vue.ai, customers will also generally have a better experience.
We at Iterate connect our customers to companies like these when we see there’s a need for it. There’s no need to rifle through the millions of curators out there and spend way too much money to find the right one when we have already done the research. We can already tell you the right one, and we are dedicated to doing so.
Vue.ai On Model KPI's (Site):
Global 1900 stores